The Exterminating Angel Film Difficulty Ranking: 3

Ever had a party where the friends you invited just don’t go home? They’ve stayed for dinner, stayed the night, and even though you’ve fed them breakfast in the morning, they’re still here! Well that’s what happens in Bunuel’s Exterminating Angel. It’s intriguing, entertaining, and Bunuel-level absurd. You’ve got to love it!

Why Watch the Exterminating Angel?
  • See more of Bunuel’s dark view of human nature (watch Viridiana for more)
  • To laugh at the aristocracy just like Monty Python’s Twit of the Year
  • For surrealism at it’s finest – there are bears and sheep wandering through the house, floating hands, and chicken legs in purses!
  • To learn how to small talk and ditch someone you don’t want to speak to anymore onto someone else
The Breakdown

The film starts with guests arriving in their fancy cars at the gates of a mansion in Spain. As the guests are entering the house, the servants are trying to leave like rats from a drowning ship. But what is the problem with this house?

Well it’s full of the aristocracy that’s why. The guests have their fancy dinner, and continue to have drinks, and then coffee, then go to sleep. At this party, the guests just don’t leave.

In the morning, the host tries to get them to leave after breakfast, but his plan fails. None of the guests leave. In fact, in a surrealist twist, none of them can leave. They are somehow all confined to fight for survival in the morning room of this giant mansion.

Yes, this film is absurd. But it’s also intriguing and entertaining enough to keep on watching. As for the political allegories, Roger Ebert puts it best:

“The dinner guests represent the ruling class in Franco’s Spain. Having set a banquet table for themselves by defeating the workers in the Spanish Civil War, they sit down for a feast, only to find it never ends. They’re trapped in their own bourgeois cul-de-sac. Increasingly resentful at being shut off from the world outside, they grow mean and restless; their worst tendencies are revealed.”

Conclusion

This is vintage Bunuel. Just like in Viridiana he subtly makes fun of Franco’s Spain. In this case he makes fun of the aristocracy who are trapped in their upper class bubble (their own oversized mansion).

 

The Magic Gloves

The Magic Gloves Film Difficulty Ranking: 3

If you’re a fan of deadpan humor, look no further. In The Magic Gloves, Martin Rejtman takes the mundane, everyday meetings and conversations that plague our lives and turns them into something to laugh at. There’s nothing special about any of the characters, they’re all regular people like us passing through life without much happening. They also don’t seem to be in control of what’s going on. Life just happens to them and they’re happy to follow where it leads them. When things do happen and their lives look like their going to turn into a success, their luck is quickly balanced out to humble them. But the film never feels heavy or depressing to watch as it makes fun of the trivialities and coincidences we give importance to in our lives. After all nothing really matters.

From: Argentina, South America
Watch: Trailer, JustWatch
Next: Whisky, Rapado, Barking Dogs Never Bite

The Colors of the Mountain Film Difficulty Ranking: 3

Buy by clicking on the poster or find it elsewhere!

Watch The Colors of the Mountain to see the beauty and ugliness of Colombia side by side. See beauty in the lush vegetation, innocent school children, and peaceful life in the countryside. And see ugliness in the spreading war between the local guerillas and paramilitaries. Luckily for tourists, the ugliness of the war has subsided. And luckily for film viewers, Colombia is still producing great films, just go and watch Embrace of the Serpent after this one.

Why Watch The Colors of the Mountain?
  • For a great coming-of-age film (for more coming-of-age films check out Kids Return, The Wounded Angel)
  • See the beautiful Colombian countryside and the people that live in it
  • Witness how the war between the guerillas and the paramilitary groups affected life in Colombia (for something similar, see Silvered Water which follows a young kid living in the Syrian war zone)
  • See how arepas are made!
The Breakdown

The Colors of the Mountain starts with a shot of a small house in the lush Colombian countryside. A boy with a football in his arms runs down the drive and into the rolling fields across from his house. The countryside is full of sounds of insects, birds, and frogs, and you can almost feel the heat. The boy runs to his friend’s house and persuades him to come and play football.

This is their simple, peaceful life. They wake up, eat, and either go to school or play football. 9-year old Manuel’s parents are always around the house, tending to their two cows, fixing the house, or cooking. Life is good.

However, the signs of trouble become more and more obvious. The first sign of danger is the graffitti written across the wall of the school in red: ‘el pueblo con las armas, vencer o morir’. This roughly translates to ‘the town with weapons, conquer or die’. Secondly, the potential danger is confirmed in Manuel’s Dad. When Manuel and his Dad are milking their cow, his Dad spots four men in ponchos walking up to their house. You can just make out the butt of a machine gun on one of them, protruding from their clothes. Manuel’s Dad urgently grabs Manuel and runs him into their house to hide. His reaction confirms the threat of the men in ponchos, and the danger they live with which is largely unnoticed by Manuel and his friends.

Conclusion

The Colors of the Mountain shows us the danger posed by both the Guerillas and the Paramilitaries in rural Colombia. It also shows us how normal life can temporarily appear in a war zone. For those that want to see Colombia in all it’s beauty and ugliness, this one is for you.

 

 

Ephraim in Lamb

Lamb Film Difficulty Ranking: 3

Beautiful scenery, beautifully shot, Lamb could be a travel commercial for the Ethiopian tourist board. But the beautiful landscape can’t be fully enjoyed by Ephraim and his family as they’ve run out of food. The worst of each of them shows itself on film as they struggle to get by – will Ephraim’s beloved lamb survive?

From: Ethiopia, Africa
Watch: Trailer, Amazon Prime, Kanopy, Rent on Amazon, Buy on Amazon
Next: Pather Panchali, Rams, Abouna
Continue reading “Lamb – See a Patriarchy Struggling to Get By”
No Film Difficulty Ranking: 3

No is probably the best film about the fall of a modern dictator (Pinochet in Chile).

Why Watch No?
  • To see what life was like in a country where police brutality was not just normal, but expected: Pinochet’s Chile
  • If you work in advertising and want to see how you could change the world
  • Because it’s got Gael Garcia Bernal in the lead role, that guy in Motorcycle Diaries, Amores Perros, Desierto, and many more
  • It’s another great film from Pablo Larrain; for more check out Neruda, Jackie, and Tony Manero
The Breakdown

It’s 1988 in Chile, and Chile is still being lorded over by Pinochet, one of the world’s most repressive dictators. After 16 years in power, growing international pressure has forced Pinochet and the Chilean government to hold a vote where the public can vote ‘No’ for a democracy or ‘Yes’ for another 8 years of Pinochet. Gael Garcia Bernal plays Rene, one of Chile’s top advertising professionals who has been given the opportunity to lead the ‘No’ campaign to end the Pinochet dictatorship.

You’ll see that the team behind the ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ campaigns use completely different advertising tactics. Whilst the ‘Yes’ campaign goes for very obvious propaganda messages depicting Pinochet as a national hero, the ‘No’ campaign message simply tries to depict ‘freedom’ (kind of like your typical Coke or Pepsi ad). If you don’t know anything about advertising, this film is worth watching just to see how people use adverts to influence people.

You’ll also notice that this film looks different from most. To film it, Pablo Larrain used 3/4 inch Sony U-matic magnetic tape, which some might recognise from old TV news shows. It’s grainy look gives the film’s storyline more credibility as it makes it appear more like a documentary film. It made me believe that Rene was an actual person, and that this whole film was based on truth. In reality, it’s only based on a true story.

Image result for no film

Conclusion

No is shot well, has a great story line, and you’ll learn something about Chilean history. It was also nominated for an Academy Award so I’m not wrong.